Reentry Court Symposium Map

• Law & Morality in Drug Court

Reentry Court Symposium/One Day Skills Building Workshop: Boston, Mass; June 2,2010

The Reentry Court Symposium Map  provides Reentry Court Symposium Attendees  (and those interested observers, unavailable to attend ),   with specific resource suggestions keyed to the Symposium Agenda (See Agenda and Map below):

REENTRY COURT SYMPOSIUM AGENDA

The morning session is made up mostly of interactive panel discussions and end with teams working together on problems presented (9-12AM):

Moderator: Judge Jeff Tauber (ret.) [email protected]

(1) Reentry Court as part of a State-wide System: Where do we fit in?

Mike Brady, State Parole Administrator, CA

Mary Kay Hudson, IN AOC Manager

Melissa Knopp, OH AOC Manager

Scott Johnson, Chief State Supervisor, Missouri Board Probation and Parole

Judith Viglione, PA Parole Board

(2) Building your Reentry Court: The different faces of Reentry Court

Judge Chris Carpenter, Columbia, MO Christine

Judge John Creuzot, Dallas TX

Judge Steven Manley, Santa Clara County CA

Judge John Surbeck, Fort Wayne , IN

Chris Watler, Court Coordinator, NYC

(3) Working with serious high risk offenders: “Taking it to the Streets”

(with a special panel including parolees)

The Afternoon session will lead off with a major lecture:

(4) How Evidence Based Practices works in a Reentry Court (2:00-3:15 PM):

Judge John Creuzot, Dallas TX, john [email protected]

Teresa May Williams, Probation, Dallas   [email protected]

Thereafter, the audience will split into four groups (3:30-4:45);

Facilitator: Al Siegel, Center for Court Innovation

(A) The Court: Judge, D.A., Defense Counsel, Coordinator, case managers

Moderators: Judge Chris Carpenter MO

Judge Jose Salinas, Indianapolis; IN

Cindy McCoy, Director, Grant Count Correctional Services

(B) Monitoring/ Sanctions: Parole, Probation, Community Policing, Jail Personnel

Moderators: Alfred Siegel, Deputy Director of the Center for Court Innovation

Mike Brady, State Parole Administrator, CA

David Leitenberger, Richland County Probation Administrator

(C) Rehabilitation: Drug Treatment, Mental Health Professional, Job Training and Education, Housing and Family Problems, community non-profits, concerned citizens

Moderators: Chris Watler Coordinator, NYC, Harlem parole Reentry Court

Michael Princivalli, Columbia/ Boone County MO Program Coordinator

Jeffrey Yanis, Indianapolis, IN Coordinator

(D) State Wide Systems: Legislators, State Parole/Probation Managers, AOC Personnel, Appellate Judges, State Probation and Parole Administrators.

Moderators: Julius Lang, Center for Court Innovation; TA Director

Scott Johnson, Chief State Supervisor, MO Board of Probation and Parole

Melissa Knopp, OH AOC Manager

Each group will discuss the same topics, but from their unique professional perspective: (a) Who gets in: eligibility, screening and assessments (b)  Components that work: Sanctions, Incentives and other reentry tools (c) Team efforts: Creating seamless services and monitoring for returnees (d) Working with the serious offenders: dealing with a challenging population.

FINALE

• Articles
  • Ten Reasons To Build A Reentry Court in 2010 [2]
  • Law & Morality in Drug Court
• Community-Based Courts
  • An Introduction To Community-Based Courts
  • Building Community Into Reentry Courts [3]
• Contracts and Standards
  • Indiana’s State-Wide Rules [1]
  • Implementing Structural Accountability
• Contributors
  • Senator Claire McCaskill: A call for Reentry Courts
  • Doug Marlowe: A Sober Assessment Of Drug Court
• Educational Curriculum
  • Prison-Based Reentry Court Assessment
  • Jail-Based Reentry Court Assessment
    • Reentry Court Training No.1: “Skills Based Training”
      • Reentry Court Training Agenda
      • Training Introductory Materials
      • Training Promo
• Educational Materials
  • Four Roles of a Judge in a Community-Based Court [2]
  • A Self-Assessment Guide
• Evaluation and Research
  • Western Criminology Rev.
  • Ohio Offender Reentry
  • Harlem Reentry Court [3]
• Evidence Based Practices
  • CCJ/COSCA Resolution 12 [4]
  • EBP in Drug Courts [4]
  • New EBP Internet Tool [4]
  • Implications For Judiciaries [4]
  • A Model Bibliography
• Federal Reentry Courts
  • Federal Reentry Courts In An EBP Context
  • The District Of Oregon Reentry Court
  • Michigan’s ACE Reentry Court
• Historical Documents
  • Oakland’s F.I.R.S.T Drug Court:1990-1993 Report
  • A Judicial Primer On Drug Courts:1993
  • The Co-Funding of Drug Court Systems: 1993
  • Five Policy Papers: 1994
  • Contingency Contracting in Oakland:1995
  • Drug Courts’ Ten Key Components:1997
  • CCJ/COSCA Resolution: Problem-Solving Courts
    • CCJ Resolution 22/COSCA Resolution 4
      • 2004 : Resolution 22 Reaffirmed
      • 2009: CCJ/COSCA Resolution 3
    • The Resolution’s Genesis: Interview with Dan Becker
• NDCI Monograph: 1999
  • “Reentry Drug Courts”: NDCI Monograph#3
  • Jail-Based Reentry Court Focus Group
• Proposals
  • Four Policy Papers: A Proposal for a National Reentry Court Initiative
    • Executive Summary
    • An Introduction to Community-Based Courts
    • Policy Paper No.1: Proposal For A National Reentry Court Initiative
    • Policy Paper No.2: County Jail-Based Reentry Court
    • Policy Paper No.3: Prison Based Reentry Courts
    • Policy Paper No.4: Implementing A National reentry court Initiative
  • A Proposal For A Reentry/Drug Court Demonstration Project
  • A State Reentry Court Proposal [1]
• Reentry Court Funding
  • “Second Chance Act” of 2009-2010
  • TEXT of Sec.111: “Second Chance Act”
• Reentry Court Initiative (RCI) Of 2000
  • A Call For Papers:1999
  • Reentry Courts Process Evaluation: Final Report
  • Delaware’s Reentry Court: A Judge’s Perspective
• Reentry Court Jurisdiction
  • Problem-Solving Courts and the States
• Reentry Court RFP
  • BJA’s Reentry Court
  • EBP Based Solicitation
  • Targeting State Criminal Justice Leaders [1]
  • Jail-Based Reentry Court As Grant Applicant
• Reentry Court: County Based Jurisdiction model
  • Pre-Entry Court: Prob. Based Reentry Court [2]
  • Dallas SAFPF Program: A Unique Reentry Court
  • HOPE: A Different Probation Strategy
• Reentry Court: State Based Jurisdiction Model
  • Ten Prison-Based Reentry Court Models [2]
  • Columbia, Missouri: Split Probation Sentencing
  • Fort Wayne: Indiana’s Systemic Reentry Court
  • Harlem’s Administrative Parole Reentry Court
  • Mansfield, Ohio, A Model for Collaboration
• Reentry Court Innovations
  • A Swift & Certain Incentivized PreEntry Court [2]
  • A Minimalist Reentry Court For Recessionary Times [2]
  • A Reentry Court System